quivsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qui | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 45 in Download Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 736 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +182 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.33.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
qui scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
qui ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, qui is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
qui is growing faster right now (+182 stars in 30 days).
qui details →Windows ARM details →