transfer.shvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transfer.sh | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 905 | 93 035 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +1 288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).
transfer.sh details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with