copypartyvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted File Sharing projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 47 150 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +377 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+377 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →transfer.sh details →All File Sharing projects →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with