transcribervsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transcriber | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
transcriber details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep transcriber, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with