Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUIvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 38 936 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +423 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI needs more configuration.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is growing faster right now (+423 stars in 30 days).
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with