transcribervsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transcriber | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 93 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).
transcriber details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep transcriber, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with