Traffic SourcevsWren AI OSS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Traffic Source | Wren AI OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 27 in Analytics | #4 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 17 997 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +261 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 56 |
| Latest release | — | wren-v0.17.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wren AI OSS scores 73/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Wren AI OSS ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Wren AI OSS is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
Wren AI OSS is growing faster right now (+261 stars in 30 days).
Traffic Source details →Wren AI OSS details →
Swap a project
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with
Keep Wren AI OSS, compare it with