Traffic Sourcevsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Traffic Source | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
Traffic Source details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with