TradingAgentsvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 2 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zot Registry details →