TradingAgentsvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zero-K details →