TradingAgentsvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 75/100 for Zabbix, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zabbix details →