TradingAgentsvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 118 130 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 771 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →wyoming-piper details →