TradingAgentsvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 118 130 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 771 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →worklenz details →