TradingAgentsvswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 117 848 | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 489 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 163 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.853.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 77/100 for windmill, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 163 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →windmill details →