TradingAgentsvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →WhisperLive---CPU details →