TradingAgentsvsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 118 088 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 729 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 729 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Whirl details →