TradingAgentsvsWeTTY
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | WeTTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 117 877 | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 518 | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 69/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.
WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →WeTTY details →