TradingAgentsvsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 117 928 | 35 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 569 | +373 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for web-check, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →web-check details →