TradingAgentsvsvito
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | vito | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 27 in Server Management |
| GitHub stars | 118 199 | 3 259 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 840 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.2.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 64/100 for vito, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for vito.
If you want the quickest setup, vito is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →vito details →