TradingAgentsvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →UUSEC WAF details →