TradingAgentsvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Urbit details →