TradingAgentsvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 117 613 | 56 863 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 254 | +134 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Typst, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Typst details →