tidaloadervstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tidaloader | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 31 in Music | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 160 | 16 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 51 |
| Latest release | — | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 46/100 for tidaloader, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tidaloader.
If you want the quickest setup, tidaloader is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+249 stars in 30 days).
tidaloader details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep tidaloader, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with