textsnapvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| textsnap | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 196 | 41 142 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 76 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
textsnap details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep textsnap, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with