PaddleOCRvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 91 864 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +423 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+423 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with