temporalvsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 24 057 | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +779 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with