temporalvsytdlp_web_player
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | ytdlp_web_player | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 24 044 | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +784 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.
If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →ytdlp_web_player details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep ytdlp_web_player, compare it with