temporalvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 24 047 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with