temporalvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 24 047 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with