temporalvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 | 2 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +789 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+789 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with