temporalvsweb-portal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | web-portal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #23 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 24 063 | 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +785 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for web-portal, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for web-portal.
If you want the quickest setup, web-portal is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →web-portal details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep web-portal, compare it with