temporalvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 044 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +784 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 33 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with