temporalvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 24 064 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +786 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+786 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with