temporalvsunopim
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | unopim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 052 | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +774 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.
unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →unopim details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep unopim, compare it with