temporalvstranscriber
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | transcriber | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 24 059 | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +781 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.
If you want the quickest setup, transcriber is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →transcriber details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep transcriber, compare it with