temporalvsTicky
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Ticky | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #14 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 054 | 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +776 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 2 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 50/100 for Ticky, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Ticky.
If you want the quickest setup, Ticky is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Ticky details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Ticky, compare it with