SyncTubevstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SyncTube | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 395 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Haxe | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 51/100 for SyncTube, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SyncTube.
If you want the quickest setup, SyncTube is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
SyncTube details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep SyncTube, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with