SyncthingvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Syncthing | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in File Sync | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 89 843 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +961 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Syncthing scores 90/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Syncthing ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
Syncthing is growing faster right now (+961 stars in 30 days).
Syncthing details →Winter CMS details →