Sync-invsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sync-in | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 86 in File Sharing | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 944 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Sync-in scores 63/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
Sync-in is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Sync-in details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Sync-in, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with