SyncthingvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Syncthing | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in File Sync | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 89 862 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +952 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Syncthing scores 90/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Syncthing ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
Syncthing is growing faster right now (+952 stars in 30 days).
Syncthing details →Traffic Source details →