Sync-invsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sync-in | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 86 in File Sharing | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 945 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Sync-in scores 62/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Sync-in is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
Sync-in details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Sync-in, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with