copypartyvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 47 184 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with