SupersetvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Superset | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 75 342 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +441 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 11 |
| Latest release | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Superset scores 88/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Superset details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Superset, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with