RedashvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Redash, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with