grocyvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grocy | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Home Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 9 625 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Blade | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 75/100 for grocy, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grocy.
If you want the quickest setup, grocy is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
grocy details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep grocy, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with