supabasevsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 114 268 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 520 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with