clickhousevsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 50 658 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +601 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
clickhouse is growing faster right now (+601 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →Wastebin details →