nocodbvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with