supabasevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 114 240 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 531 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 33 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 531 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with