clickhousevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 50 646 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +605 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 33 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
clickhouse is growing faster right now (+605 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →Warpgate details →